Hello folks,
I have asked this same question many times, in different words...
Namely, if we design a solution that fits the requirements, and bridges
the gaps as analyzed in the gap analysis document, have we succeeded?
Or, is there a requirement for the work to be adopted by 3GPP?
What if we design for IEEE 802 Wireless, which is currently carrying the
preponderance of the world's wireless data, and will almost assuredly
continue to carry a greater proportion?
Regards
Charlie P.
On 9/4/2014 3:14 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Hi,
....
In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a
hard-rooted disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP -
and the deployments. We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments
(2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP. We also know that 3GPP specs do
mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP has not
the same disconnect as here.
On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used
- the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the
slideware attracting real customers.
The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect.
Alex
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
--
Regards,
Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
