Hi Behcet, Look for the qualifiers which states its an opinion. Don't just poke. Goal is to converge - Read that.
If you disagree with this, I assume you want a debate on the protocol choice. Go for it. Sri On 9/10/14 3:15 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Sri, > >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ><[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Fred, >> >> >> IMHO, DMM solution need to be tied to one specific protocol. We don't >>have >> to battle this out and come up with one answer. Once we have high-level >> view of the solution and the interfaces, its possible to realize those >> interfaces using any protocols. You call it MIP, GTP, Aero ..does not >> matter. The core specs can identify the interface requirements and the >> specific protocol documents can publish extensions to the protocols. We >> let the deployments make the call on the protocol choice. >> > >These are your views. >Not mine for sure. > >Regards, > >Behcet >> >> >> Regards >> Sri >> >> >> >> >> >> On 9/10/14 11:43 AM, "Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>>Hi Jouni, >>> >>>I'd like to propose a slightly different charter: >>> >>> "AERO already solves distributed mobility management and provides a >>> a comprehensive mobility solution for any mobile device. AERO should >>> therefore be approved as the mobility management solution for DMM. >>> Publication of AERO will therefore conclude the working group's >>> activity." >>> >>>Can we have this on the agenda? >>> >>>Thanks - Fred >>>[email protected] >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:37 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: Dapeng Liu; [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming >>>> >>>> >>>> What do you mean by no agenda? To me it clearly says we use the call >>>>#2 >>>> for setting up the work split. >>>> >>>> - Jouni >>>> >>>> 9/10/2014 9:06 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: >>>> > Jouni, why don't we cancel this one (#2) and do the next one (#3) >>>>with >>>> > an agenda? >>>> > I hope Alper can attend :-) >>>> > >>>> > Regards, >>>> > >>>> > Behcet >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Jouni Korhonen >>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> It seems I sent this to a wrong receiver.. that explains why it did >>>>not >>>> >> appear on the list. >>>> >> >>>> >> - Jouni >>>> >> >>>> >> -------- Alkuperäinen viesti / Orig.Msg. -------- >>>> >> Aihe: DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming >>>> >> Päiväys: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:43:24 +0300 >>>> >> Lähettäjä: Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> >>>> >> Vastaanottaja: [email protected] >>>> >> CC: [email protected], Dapeng Liu <[email protected]> >>>> >> >>>> >> Folks, >>>> >> >>>> >> The next interim is close. Assuming there are no overwhelming >>>>amount >>>>of >>>> >> comments to the re-charter text, we are ready to start setting up >>>>the >>>> >> work split on the solution space! Remember the discussion and the >>>> >> minutes from the IETF#90 Friday session. No other agenda items are >>>> >> planned for the next interim. >>>> >> >>>> >> - Jouni & Dapeng >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> dmm mailing list >>>> >> [email protected] >>>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dmm mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>_______________________________________________ >>>dmm mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
