El 11/08/17 a les 07:43, Didier Kryn ha escrit: > Le 10/08/2017 à 16:22, Jamey Fletcher a écrit : >>> Le 09/08/2017 à 22:46, Joel Roth a écrit : >>> Despite what the author claims, this series of pages isn't about >>> init. It is mostly about supervision and a little about containers. It >>> assumes both are usefull, with no argumentation to motivate supervision. >>> Confusion about init, supervision, and containers typically suggests >>> that the author has been contaminated by systemd propaganda. >>> Also I don't like the style of this series of explanations; there >>> is little content within a lot of decoration and structure. Clearly the >>> author has tried all these supervisors but his explanations could be >>> more detailed. >> And the answer is... >> >> Take what he's written, add in your thoughts, more clearly specify the >> differences between inits, supervisors, hypervisors, and containers, and >> write up your own explanation. >> >> One thing I might suggest, since you think his explanations could be more >> detailed, is do a short explanation for each section, kind of an >> executive >> summary, and then add in a section closed up initially for more detail >> for >> those who need it. >> > I thing you're taking me wrong. I don't claim I know the matter > better that the author. He studied all these supervisors in some detail; > I didn't. I just say he failed to explain things in an educative way - > and it seems to me doesn't consider it worth. >
Something has to be done (written) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
