On Apr 8, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4/8/20 9:23 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> On Apr 8, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think those comparisons belong in a separate document. Which >>> would leave this draft as just the spec for doing DNS over QUIC. >> >> Would the WG still want to do the protocol work if the eventual >> comparison was "not noticeably better than DoT or DoH"? > > While I think that's an interesting question in the abstract > I agree that it doesn't belong in this document, at least not > in quite those terms. I also think that discussion is at least > partly implicit in the use case, largely because of the > question of defining "better for what?"
Quite true. If the document specifies use cases, the WG would have a better idea of whether or not we want to adopt before or after we know if those use cases are already met approximately as well by DoT and/or DoH. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
