On 4/8/20 9:23 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Apr 8, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think those comparisons belong in a separate document. Which >> would leave this draft as just the spec for doing DNS over QUIC. > > Would the WG still want to do the protocol work if the eventual > comparison was "not noticeably better than DoT or DoH"?
While I think that's an interesting question in the abstract I agree that it doesn't belong in this document, at least not in quite those terms. I also think that discussion is at least partly implicit in the use case, largely because of the question of defining "better for what?" Melinda -- Melinda Shore [email protected] Software longa, hardware brevis _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
