What do the devices say their DNS server is? If it’s the .1 address this would expected behavior because that’s the dnsmasq dns address.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2019, at 12:28, Art Greenberg <a...@artg.tv> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 27, 2019, at 12:42, john doe wrote: >> >> Not strictly an answer, but don't forget that Dnsmasq is normaly >> configured using OpenWRT. >> So, if you were able to get everything working previously, there is no >> reason why you can't do it here. >> >> >> In other words, OpenWrt might be the culprit and not Dnsmasq. >> >> -- >> John Doe > > Well, yes and no. OpenWRT is "just" a Linux distro. The maintainers have > adopted a very clever configuration scheme that unifies (almost) all of the > configuration and makes configuration possible entirely through a web-based > interface. > > But ... I wrested control of dnsmasq from that schema. I have a very > conventional dnsmasq setup with my own config files just like I had > previously on CentOS. > > I think its more that all DNS request now pass through dnsmasq, while > previously I could arrange for some not to. And I'm not clever enough to > figure out how to tell dnsmasq how to not respond to DNS requests from > certain hosts on my network without resorting to running multiple instances > of dnsmasq. > > -- > Art Greenberg > a...@artg.tv > > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
