> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses/
I missed previous discussions (at dnsext).
However, there were many discussions about multiple queries in one request.
We need summaries of previous discussions,
and need to consider why many idea stopped.
* For the draft,
Using unstructured data (TXT format) is not good.
I agree query name restriction (Additional records MUST be leaf
records at the same node in the DNS tree).
I think the multiple queries in one request is not related to DNSSEC
and TCP connection. They are separated elements.
* My idea
I prefer multiple query sections (with some restrictions)
and merged answers.
multiple query examples may be
NAME A + NAME AAAA + MX
NAME A + NAME AAAA + _443._tcp.NAME TLSA
NAME A + NAME AAAA + _sip._udp.NAME SRV + _sips._tcp.NAME SRV + ...
Many people may dislike QDCOUNT != 1.
EDNS0 option which contain additional query section may be possible.
--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
