Hm, possibly what you mean is that it's not mentioned explicitly enough.
I think the document covers the problem in quite a bit of detail, but the
private domains stuff is mostly in the history section; I could understand
if you felt that this provided insufficient clarity.

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:10 PM, John R Levine <> wrote:

> Section 4.1.2 of the tldr document actually says almost exactly what you
>> said in your four-pronged strategy, but without the pejorative bit.
> I just looked at it again, and don't see anything about the toxic waste
> names.  Since they're the ones that are hard, I really think we need to
> call them out.  Feel free to come up with a different metaphor if you don't
> like the one about a part of the DNS space that's too polluted to use.
> R's,
> John
DNSOP mailing list

Reply via email to