> On 7 Oct 2026, at 15:32, Joe Abley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 7 Oct 2026, at 13:35, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I got one more suggestion of list: >> >> dnscamel > > What a glorious compromise.
No. As I wrote recently: That metaphor has caused much delay in innovation in the DNS. While folks are trying to innovate to make it simpler, faster, more effective, more efficient, more secure and automated, some grew concerned about the growing complexity in the DNS and warned of expanding the already large number of DNS-related RFCs. Essentially, their message was: “Don’t burden the Camel any further.” Unfortunately, that got a lot of attention and made people cautious, while not making the situation any better. So, for a good eight, nine years, we had no innovation in the DNS. And of course, if you have no innovation, you have no automation. Calling a working group “camel” misses the point of the WG completely. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
