On Wed, Oct 7, 2026 at 1:50 PM Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Most ideas are bad, including mine. Please don't give an automatic green > light to all forms of innovation. Let's require simplicity and tolerate new > rfcs only if they help us get there. Innovation should trigger suspicion. > I don't think anyone has proposed green lighting anything. I agree that new protocol enhancement proposals need to be subject to very rigorous review before being accepted. And my feeling is that DNS working group chairs to date have largely been trying to ensure that the working group does that. Roy's point, which I agree with totally, is that the "DNS camel" metaphor has been used to injudiciously and indiscriminately bludgeon away good proposals too. And why isn't there a TLS camel, or a HTTP camel by the way? Those are protocol communities where the rate of enhancements seem to be significantly higher than DNS. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
