On 7 Oct 2026, at 19:42, Roy Arends <[email protected]> wrote: > As I wrote recently: That metaphor has caused much delay in innovation in the > DNS. While folks are trying to innovate to make it simpler, faster, more > effective, more efficient, more secure and automated, some grew concerned > about the growing complexity in the DNS and warned of expanding the already > large number of DNS-related RFCs.
I read what you wrote. It's certainly an opinion. I think concern about complexity is important. I have not seen any data to suggest that that concern has stifled innovation. I have also not seen any data to suggest that complexity has stifled innovation, but I think it's equally possible. That's also an opinion. > Calling a working group “camel” misses the point of the WG completely. I think the opposite. I think it continues to be a helpful reminder for all future protocol development. If the curious name causes even one person to dig into the reference, I think that would be excellent, regardless of what opinion they happen to hold. My, this is an excellent shade of bikeshed, I expected nothing less. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
