On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 08:14:48AM -0700, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Roy, > At 12:28 PM 07-10-2026, Roy Arends wrote: > > Whether it is good or bad, let's agree that "Camel" has a special > > meaning in this community: it represents a particular view about DNS > > complexity and the cost of further protocol extensions. Whatever the > > merits of that view, the cuteness of the name, or the contemporary > > rhetorical value it had, we should not institutionalise it by making it > > the name of a working group intended to be a neutral venue for DNS > > protocol work. > > The person(s) who came up with that name may have been inspired by this: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-dnsop-sessa-the-dns-camel-01 > There could be a link to it in the (future) charter if they intent is to > explain something.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/49/slides/PLENARY-3/sld043.htm _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
