How about PANACEA or SAN?
The first - I'd have to make up a group name for the bacronym. The
second stands for Swiss Army Knife.
Both because DNS appears (to some people) to be the solution for almost
every distributed data problem on the internet. Might as well own it!
Mike
On 10/7/2026 13:40, Roy Arends wrote:
On 7 Oct 2026, at 15:32, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7 Oct 2026, at 13:35, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote:
I got one more suggestion of list:
dnscamel
What a glorious compromise.
No.
As I wrote recently: That metaphor has caused much delay in innovation in the
DNS. While folks are trying to innovate to make it simpler, faster, more
effective, more efficient, more secure and automated, some grew concerned about
the growing complexity in the DNS and warned of expanding the already large
number of DNS-related RFCs. Essentially, their message was: “Don’t burden the
Camel any further.” Unfortunately, that got a lot of attention and made people
cautious, while not making the situation any better. So, for a good eight, nine
years, we had no innovation in the DNS. And of course, if you have no
innovation, you have no automation.
Calling a working group “camel” misses the point of the WG completely.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
