----- Original Message ----- > On 28-03-2012 19:44, André Malo wrote: > > * Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> I'd prefer that we add CSS with an age-based discoloration of the > >> page > >> and associated watermark, but I have no time to find the right > >> CSS. > > I like that. > > > > First step is anyhow to integrate an age check into metafile.pl or > > something. then we can do anything useful with it (if we decide to > > retire, > > we can also just don't generate the html anymore, for example). > > > > Gimme a few days, it shouldn't be that hard to do the metafile > > stuff. If no > > one beats me... ;) > > > > nd > +1 > It seems like a viable solution indeed. > If we were to adopt this idea, the question would then become: How > should we "age" and watermark these pages? > I made two examples of how watermarks could be put in place, at > http://www.humbedooh.com/outdated/mpm_common.html and > http://www.humbedooh.com/outdated/mpm_common2.html respectively, but
That looks.. harsh.. ;) Anyway, I remember last time I looked into translating new directives for the German documentation that.. translation is *hard* For me, anyway. But I must admit I'm with kess and nd here: Even if outdated, they aren't completely useless. We should find a way to validate context and defaults - and link missing directives in the English docs. i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org