On 3/28/2012 10:29 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we retire (ie, svn delete) translations in 2.4 that >> are more than, say, 2 years out of date, as they assuredly don't reflect the >> current state of things, and do a disservice to our customers. Leaving them >> in trunk seems harmless, but having them in a released product is misleading. >> >> I haven't yet done the actual poking around to determine which translations >> that would be, but I'd suspect .ja, .ko, .es and .de? >> >> Or we could be more selective, and get rid of translations of things >> (authnz, logging, proxy) that we know for certain has radically changed in >> the last few years, while leaving things like the index files that may still >> be worthwhile. > > I'd prefer that we add CSS with an age-based discoloration of the page > and associated watermark, but I have no time to find the right CSS.
Along those lines, if we set out a roadmap for retiring "abandoned" translations after "X" months (could be one more year), and highlighted these on the http://httpd.apache.org/ main website for garbage collection unless volunteers step forward, maybe some stale translations might find some translators? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
