Hi Vincent, thanks for the explanation, but I still believe that this bug is a bit borderline. I didn't see any discussion in the bug and no +1 to support the request, this is why I closed it (probably mistakenly). We can discuss it in this mailing list and adapt the announcement text if we feel necessary, let's wait for more opinions :)
Thanks! Luca 2016-01-13 1:21 GMT-08:00 Vincent Bray <nood...@gmail.com>: > The bug report seems quite clear to me. It's saying that by having a > description of all the new features in the 2.4 branch as a whole under a > title that names a specific minor release is misleading. To this day the > project home page implies that "Loadable MPMs, major improvements to OCSP > support" and so forth, are features newly introduced in 2.4.18. > > The issue could be fixed simply be reworking this sentence: > > This version of httpd is a major release of the 2.4 stable branch, and > represents the best available version of Apache HTTP Server. New features > include Loadable MPMs, major improvements to OCSP support, mod_lua, Dynamic > Reverse Proxy configuration, Improved Authentication/Authorization, FastCGI > Proxy, New Expression Parser, and a Small Object Caching API. > > .. as .. > > This version of httpd is a *patch level* release of the 2.4 stable branch, > and represents the best available version of Apache HTTP Server. New > features *in the 2.4 branch* include Loadable MPMs, major improvements to > OCSP support, mod_lua, Dynamic Reverse Proxy configuration, Improved > Authentication/Authorization, FastCGI Proxy, New Expression Parser, and a > Small Object Caching API. > > n > > > On 13 Jan 2016, at 04:12, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > > > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55841 > > > > Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Resolution|--- |INVALID > > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > > > > --- Comment #1 from Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> --- > > Hi Filipus, > > > > sorry to get back to you after 3 yrs. I re-read the issue several times > but I > > didn't fully get the issue that you were describing, I believe that it > might be > > a bit too generic. I am not seeing a lot of +1 or discussions so I would > be > > inclined to close it, but please re-open it if you feel that we are > missing > > something important. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Luca > > > > -- > > You are receiving this mail because: > > You are the assignee for the bug. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org > >
