https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55841
--- Comment #7 from Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> --- Hi Filipus, following up on your last message: > Calling this "misleading" is to put it mildly. Would you mind to put an example of how the email message should look like to not be "misleading"? Do you have a proposal to make a change in the email's format? If so please add it to this bug so we'll be able to discuss it :) > The fact that no comment "supports the issue", as you describe it, does not > make a ticket invalid. A ticket is only invalid if its claim is incorrect. I'd like to clarify this point. I am trying to clear old bugs in the huge (~1500) buglist of httpd and for this one I thought that the absence of traction/support, together with the fact that I didn't really shared your point of view, was an indicator that the email content wasn't misleading. This was my bad since I should have probably added a comment with my thoughts before closing the bug and marking it as invalid, lesson learned for the future and my apologies :) > I disagree about it being the "responsibility of who downloads/update the new > version of httpd to check the changelog for the new minor release (not > relying only on the email message)." Users should be able to trust email sent > by the foundation. I agree with you partially. The emails from the foundation should be trusted but it is indeed a best practice (at least in my opinion) for a sysadmin/maintainer to check the Changelog to have a full and precise/complete view of what will end up in production. Thanks! Luca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
