On 3/24/15 7:25 PM, Mykle Hansen wrote:
> [...] which would provide the evidence I need to win in a court case.

It may be a challenge to get that evidence admitted.  You'll probably
need an expert to testify about how the information is recorded, how it
might be tampered with, who pulled it out, etc.  If the insurance
company doesn't want such evidence to become commonly used (I can see
that going either way) they'll make it prohibitively expensive for you
to use it.

So, although it's an interesting engineering exercise, to use something
like this economically, it'd have to be some homebrew thing _you_
implemented and operated, so that you could testify about how it works
and why it's accurate.  Then it'd be up to the insurance company to
spend money on their own experts -- it changes the economics
significantly and probably in your favor.

Good luck!
-- 
Mersenne Law LLP  ·  www.mersenne.com  ·  +1-503-679-1671
- Small Business, Startup and Intellectual Property Law -
9600 S.W. Oak Street · Suite 500 · Tigard, Oregon  97223

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
dorkbotpdx-blabber mailing list
[email protected]
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/dorkbotpdx-blabber

Reply via email to