21.07.2013 20:09, solarflow99 пишет: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru > <mailto:s...@list.ru>> wrote: > > Hi, thanks for getting involved into this. > Lets discuss it a little more then. My intention here > is NOT to push such a changes one way or another - > that's what I care the least. BUT, it is very important > to do the good research on that subject and get that > question resolved properly once and for all. I feel it > is all currently messed up, which is not good. > > So I invite everyone to comment on that subject, > even if you have not contributed much. :) > > > > The closest thing to a problem I ever had was with the freedos > binaries being included together, thats why dosemu couldn't get into > fedora. This AFAIK boils down to the fact that FreeDOS cannot be compiled inside the fedora environment. By the way, are there any updates on this? There are now the shiny new things like llvm/clang, and maybe they can handle the realmode code? Does anyone know?
> One thing I have not seen yet is the necessity to change licensing, Please read Bart's e-mail more carefully then. :) He pointed to the notable example, http://pascalek.pers.pl/en/propage/samba4dosemu-introduction Which also means (in my eyes at least) the unbiased manner of the discussion. > I like gpl 3 too, if gpl3 existed long ago dosemu probably would have > used it. But it would be a shame to drag things down over licensing. I don't think anything can be dragged down this time. Things have changed. Firstly, the discussion now happens in a public ML, instead of an IRC as it was 10 years ago. Secondly, there is now the Git, which allows us to _look_ into the proposed things, changing them quickly etc, while in the past we had to argue without much of a demonstration of our ideas, and the misunderstandings ensued. And thirdly, there is no more permanent disagreement between me and Bart on the code simplicity vs compatibility. :) Simplicity won, compatibility (with ancient linux environments) died. My goal is to simply resolve the misunderstandings that are all there in the COPYING.DOSEMU. This is a very bad place for misunderstandings IMHO. :) Considering the dire consequences of these misunderstandings, like the "GPLv2 only" instead of "GPLv2 or later", it IMHO really needs to be resolved once and for all. Aside from resolving the misunderstanding, of couse an extra steps can be done, like asking people about relicensing etc, but for now just removing the misunderstandings would be already a big achievement. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Dosemu-devel mailing list Dosemu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dosemu-devel
