22.07.2013 20:11, Eric W. Biederman пишет: > Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru> writes: > >> 22.07.2013 12:49, Eric W. Biederman пишет: >>> I don't know how old this text is but unless it is recent it should >>> stand. >> Looks rather old: 1998. >> Attaching a historical patch. >> >> So, what we have, is: >> >> - Initially, all files without a license headings, and a standard >> GPL copying, which says >> --- >> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or >> (at your option) any later version. >> --- > *Blink* > > Ok that clarifies things for me. GPLv2 is the only valid version. > > The text you quoted is the FSF's recommendation in COPYING on how to > apply it. That recomendation was not followed. Thefore a later version > of the GPL is simply not an option. As no one agreed to any later > version. Could you clarify this a little more? Who didn't agree to any later version? Who agreed on "GPLv2 only"? Who was even asked?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Dosemu-devel mailing list Dosemu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dosemu-devel
