Oh, I definitely agree. I hope the OP is reading this.. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:
> That was kind of my point! > > If your site is big enough to require DR facilities, you can use DR to > minimise (or negate) downtime. > > If your site doesn't need DR facilities, what does a small amount of > offline time overnight matter? > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, KeidrickP <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jamie, >> I don't think the OP has a DR database in place, or they probably wouldn't >> be posting this question. >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Or if you aren't using DB partitioning - upgrade your DR database, bring >>> that online, once its up, take your production system offline, upgrade that >>> and then bring it online again. >>> >>> None of these are particularly difficult issues for large sites as they >>> use multiple servers (hundreds and thousands in the case of Google) and for >>> a very small site with 1 app & 1 DB server, it isn't a problem having a few >>> hours downtime overnight. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> On any site which uses load balancing, you'll often use database >>>> partitioning too, so stick users to a particular web / db server >>>> combination >>>> and upgrade groups of servers at a time. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Vitaly Maslevskiy < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sounds good, but, typical situation. DB Schema changed, we have to >>>>> update dll's >>>>> in which order binaries/DBSchema have to be updated. If we change >>>>> schema first, >>>>> all apps is not 100% up. Only application updated first and "down" >>>>> until first request >>>>> has valid state. >>>>> >>>>> Or? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2009/12/8 Gunawan Hadikusumo <[email protected]>: >>>>> > you need load balancing...... 2 or 3 more IIS server run >>>>> simultanously >>>>> > >>>>> > so you could update those server one by one without distrupting the >>>>> current >>>>> > connected user. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:25 PM, jack me <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Is it possible to upload the dll or files without downtime of >>>>> website. >>>>> >> just for sake of example, if gmail upload some thing new in the >>>>> website like >>>>> >> chatting facility. After that extended the chat facility with video. >>>>> >> According to me this is without the downtime of the gmail. in same >>>>> manner, >>>>> >> If i want to make any updation in my website without making down the >>>>> site >>>>> >> how we can achieve this in .net. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>> >> Jack >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Keidrick Pettaway >> >> http://kpettaway.com >> > > -- Keidrick Pettaway http://kpettaway.com
