That doesn't really work, as when you change from old->new, any users who are logged in will be logged out and lose their sessions.
The main issue is that you probably don't *need* this kind of functionality. On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:30 AM, jack me <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, thanks to all. > > I found a solution but possible at server end....... I don't know it will > be related to load balancing but when i found on net about about > server-farm approach for developing software > (i have to spent some nights on google to find the way :) -i dont know i am > going in right way ---...........I found another solution for this.. when we > want to update the website without down time then we will make a new > directory on server at any place. Like > if i want to update a website like www.websitename.com Then we need to > make another directory like wwwroot > directory say "New root of file". > after uploading all updated site here in this directory. We will change the > virtual directory path of website to "New root of file". > > Processor Devil > if I want to do it with ajax the how we can do this.. May > be a service when it do not get the response then it shows the loading of > page or loading message.. Are you talking about this............? > > Thanks again > > regards, > > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Processor Devil <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Yes, it is possible... >> You can use ajax for this purpose, but you have to specify timeout not to >> interrupt the process.... I don't think this is quite good idea because if >> your Service is really down, you will find it much much later... But if you >> are not using service, but inner part of your aspx.cs or aspx.vb code, then >> it should be fine :) >> >> 2009/12/9 jack me <[email protected]> >> >> from all answers i understand this is impossible updation without down >>> time. One solution is we will have to use many servers. while updating we >>> update on one server(that server will be down for some time till updation >>> time). >>> >>> Means it will be at server level. In coding way it is not possible. ? If >>> we want at coding level . Is it possible in any way........ >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, KeidrickP <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, I definitely agree. >>>> I hope the OP is reading this.. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> That was kind of my point! >>>>> >>>>> If your site is big enough to require DR facilities, you can use DR to >>>>> minimise (or negate) downtime. >>>>> >>>>> If your site doesn't need DR facilities, what does a small amount of >>>>> offline time overnight matter? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, KeidrickP <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jamie, >>>>>> I don't think the OP has a DR database in place, or they probably >>>>>> wouldn't be posting this question. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Jamie Fraser >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Or if you aren't using DB partitioning - upgrade your DR database, >>>>>>> bring that online, once its up, take your production system offline, >>>>>>> upgrade >>>>>>> that and then bring it online again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> None of these are particularly difficult issues for large sites as >>>>>>> they use multiple servers (hundreds and thousands in the case of >>>>>>> Google) and >>>>>>> for a very small site with 1 app & 1 DB server, it isn't a problem >>>>>>> having a >>>>>>> few hours downtime overnight. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected] >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On any site which uses load balancing, you'll often use database >>>>>>>> partitioning too, so stick users to a particular web / db server >>>>>>>> combination >>>>>>>> and upgrade groups of servers at a time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Vitaly Maslevskiy < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sounds good, but, typical situation. DB Schema changed, we have to >>>>>>>>> update dll's >>>>>>>>> in which order binaries/DBSchema have to be updated. If we change >>>>>>>>> schema first, >>>>>>>>> all apps is not 100% up. Only application updated first and "down" >>>>>>>>> until first request >>>>>>>>> has valid state. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2009/12/8 Gunawan Hadikusumo <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> > you need load balancing...... 2 or 3 more IIS server run >>>>>>>>> simultanously >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > so you could update those server one by one without distrupting >>>>>>>>> the current >>>>>>>>> > connected user. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:25 PM, jack me <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Is it possible to upload the dll or files without downtime of >>>>>>>>> website. >>>>>>>>> >> just for sake of example, if gmail upload some thing new in the >>>>>>>>> website like >>>>>>>>> >> chatting facility. After that extended the chat facility with >>>>>>>>> video. >>>>>>>>> >> According to me this is without the downtime of the gmail. in >>>>>>>>> same manner, >>>>>>>>> >> If i want to make any updation in my website without making down >>>>>>>>> the site >>>>>>>>> >> how we can achieve this in .net. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >> Jack >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Keidrick Pettaway >>>>>> >>>>>> http://kpettaway.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Keidrick Pettaway >>>> >>>> http://kpettaway.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >
