Hi,

This requirement was asked by client where he have e-commerce website. He
got solution in form of load balancing from his hosting provider (as he
told). I told him this is not possible at coding side.

Thanks to all.

Regards,
Jack

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:

> That doesn't really work, as when you change from old->new, any users who
> are logged in will be logged out and lose their sessions.
>
> The main issue is that you probably don't *need* this kind of
> functionality.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:30 AM, jack me <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, thanks to all.
>>
>> I found a solution but possible at server end....... I don't know it will
>> be related to load balancing but when i found on net about  about
>> server-farm approach for developing software
>> (i have to spent some nights on google to find the way :) -i dont know i
>> am going in right way ---...........I found another solution for this.. when
>> we want to update the website without down time then we will make a new
>> directory on server at any place. Like
>> if i want to update a website like www.websitename.com Then we need to
>> make another directory like wwwroot > directory say "New root of file".
>> after uploading all updated site here in this directory. We will change the
>> virtual directory path of website to "New root of file".
>>
>> Processor Devil > if I want to do it with ajax the how we can do this..
>> May be a service when it do not get the response then it shows the loading
>> of page or loading message.. Are you talking about this............?
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>> regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Processor Devil <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it is possible...
>>> You can use ajax for this purpose, but you have to specify timeout not to
>>> interrupt the process.... I don't think this is quite good idea because if
>>> your Service is really down, you will find it much much later... But if you
>>> are not using service, but inner part of your aspx.cs or aspx.vb code, then
>>> it should be fine :)
>>>
>>> 2009/12/9 jack me <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> from all answers i understand this is impossible updation without down
>>>> time. One solution is we will have to use many servers. while updating we
>>>> update on one server(that server will be down for some time till updation
>>>> time).
>>>>
>>>> Means it will be at server level. In coding way it is not possible. ? If
>>>> we want at coding level . Is it possible in any way........
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, KeidrickP <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I definitely agree.
>>>>> I hope the OP is reading this..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jamie Fraser 
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That was kind of my point!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If your site is big enough to require DR facilities, you can use DR to
>>>>>> minimise (or negate) downtime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If your site doesn't need DR facilities, what does a small amount of
>>>>>> offline time overnight matter?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, KeidrickP <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jamie,
>>>>>>> I don't think the OP has a DR database in place, or they probably
>>>>>>> wouldn't be posting this question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Jamie Fraser <[email protected]
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or if you aren't using DB partitioning - upgrade your DR database,
>>>>>>>> bring that online, once its up, take your production system offline, 
>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>> that and then bring it online again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> None of these are particularly difficult issues for large sites as
>>>>>>>> they use multiple servers (hundreds and thousands in the case of 
>>>>>>>> Google) and
>>>>>>>> for a very small site with 1 app & 1 DB server, it isn't a problem 
>>>>>>>> having a
>>>>>>>> few hours downtime overnight.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jamie Fraser <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On any site which uses load balancing, you'll often use database
>>>>>>>>> partitioning too, so stick users to a particular web / db server 
>>>>>>>>> combination
>>>>>>>>> and upgrade groups of servers at a time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Vitaly Maslevskiy <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good, but, typical situation. DB Schema changed, we have to
>>>>>>>>>> update dll's
>>>>>>>>>> in which order binaries/DBSchema have to be updated. If we change
>>>>>>>>>> schema first,
>>>>>>>>>> all apps is not 100% up. Only application updated first and "down"
>>>>>>>>>> until first request
>>>>>>>>>> has valid state.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2009/12/8 Gunawan Hadikusumo <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>> > you need load balancing...... 2 or 3 more IIS server run
>>>>>>>>>> simultanously
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > so you could update those server one by one without distrupting
>>>>>>>>>> the current
>>>>>>>>>> > connected user.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:25 PM, jack me <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Is it possible to upload the dll or files without downtime of
>>>>>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>>> >> just for sake of example, if gmail upload some thing new in the
>>>>>>>>>> website like
>>>>>>>>>> >> chatting facility. After that extended the chat facility with
>>>>>>>>>> video.
>>>>>>>>>> >> According to me this is without the downtime of the gmail. in
>>>>>>>>>> same manner,
>>>>>>>>>> >> If i want to make any updation in my website without making
>>>>>>>>>> down the site
>>>>>>>>>> >> how we can achieve this in .net.
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> >> Jack
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Keidrick Pettaway
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://kpettaway.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Keidrick Pettaway
>>>>>
>>>>> http://kpettaway.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to