Hello Xavier, I don't have Wikipedia Account yet, so why not :) ok I send you the translation tonight (i need another proofread).
Thanks ! Elisa 2011/9/3 Xavier Brusselaers <[email protected]> > Hello Elisa, > > Welcome back. > Yesterday I've created the Wikipedia page :-) > I've only write one line... I'm waiting your texte. If you don't have a > Wikipedia Account, I can copy/paste your translation... > > Have a nice day, > > Xavier > > > 2011/9/2 Elisa Godoy de Castro Guerra <[email protected]> > >> Hi all, >> >> I come back :) >> >> I love italian and understand italian... so i translate this fantastic >> article into french. >> >> Regards, >> Elisa >> >> >> 2011/9/2 <[email protected]> >> >> I don't know their criterion for deciding whether it is objective or not. >>> >>> However I'd say that if you write “DDL is as easy to use as a gaming >>> console” you are not objective. But if you write “DDL *tries* to be as easy >>> to use as a gaming console” you're just transcribing the team will and are >>> not judging the result: this should be considered more objective. Maybe >>> you'd even have to write it more clearly to better conform to objectiveness >>> requirements: “DDL developers want to make DDL as easy to use as a gaming >>> console”. This is what Richard calls the facts. >>> >>> Concerning developers, yes we're currently only 2 developers. Benheng, >>> our main Chinese contributor, hasn't been active for months. He patched >>> Childsplay in February or March to make it handle Chinese and can be >>> considered as a developer contributor too. >>> >>> Concerning your Wikipedia page, note that even if you collected many >>> pieces of existing text, the synthesis work is good ;). Maybe a section >>> about DDL use at school would be relevant. Unfortunately, although I read >>> here and there that DDL would be installed in a school, I've never received >>> any proof of its use in a scholar environment (eg. photos or articles). >>> >>> You can also add that we are currently setting up a non-profit >>> organization to support the project. The DoudouLinux association is >>> currently being registered in France. As we've already signed the statutes >>> we can consider that the association is already existing :). We'll have an >>> official paper during the coming 10-15 days. We started to speak about its >>> objectives a while ago: >>> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00296.html >>> >>> It can be the base to write the missing paragraph in Wikipedia right now, >>> while waiting for an official definition of the association goals and ways >>> of action. I'll write a dedicated mail on this list anyway. >>> >>> Finally concerning translations, I tend to think that Richard will go >>> faster on English translation than us, since Spanish is quite close to >>> Italian (which I suspected). If you, Salvatore, feel enough at ease with >>> French, I'd prefer you to start a French translation I'll proofread, or >>> Elisa if she finds enough time to do it. Maybe Richard can write a Spanish >>> translation too? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> JM. >>> >>> >>> ----- "Richard" <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>> > Must have been my post, since it was mostly from the DDL web site. >>> > I'll take another look at it. I guess we need to be more like >>> > reporters: >>> > Who? What? When? Where? Why? How? >>> > Just the facts, ma'am. >>> > >>> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Salvatore Gagliano < >>> > [email protected] > wrote: >>> > >>> > Tanks to all of you. >>> > >>> > >>> > I've just modified things that Jean-Michel proposed. >>> > >>> > >>> > About developers, I wouldn't be not right: only Jean-Michel and Geral >>> > Kerma are developers (I mean in close meaning, not in the general >>> > meaning of "contributers"). >>> > >>> > >>> > Again: every opinion and idea is welcome. >>> > >>> > >>> > About an english version, I could try to translate it in an English >>> > draft, but I need time for this. An alternative is if someone can try >>> > to begin the translations and submit is doubt. >>> > >>> > >>> > About Wikipedia proofreaders... I am optimist, because of I tried to >>> > be objective (I red several times the article and I changed it several >>> > times) and I think to have obtained a discrete level of neutral point >>> > of view. So that, if something can be modified, I'm quite sure is >>> > nothing so big to cause deleting. Regarding deleting, I've seen that >>> > it existed an English article about DoudouLinux, but it was deleted >>> > because considered too promotional. Someone know about this? >>> > >>> > >>> > Salvatore. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Doudoulinux-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/doudoulinux-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Doudoulinux-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/doudoulinux-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Doudoulinux-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/doudoulinux-dev
