On Wednesday, August 27, 2025 1:28 PM Svyatoslav wrote:
> 27 серпня 2025 р. 07:19:39 GMT+03:00, Mikko Perttunen 
<mperttu...@nvidia.com> пише:
> >On Tuesday, August 19, 2025 9:16 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >> Tegra30 has CSI PAD clock enable bits embedded into PLLD/PLLD2 registers.
> >> Add ids for these clocks.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamo...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra30-car.h | 4 +++-
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra30-car.h
> >> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra30-car.h index
> >> f193663e6f28..14b83e90a0fc
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra30-car.h
> >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra30-car.h
> >> @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@
> >> 
> >>  #define TEGRA30_CLK_AUDIO3_MUX 306
> >>  #define TEGRA30_CLK_AUDIO4_MUX 307
> >>  #define TEGRA30_CLK_SPDIF_MUX 308
> >> 
> >> -#define TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX 309
> >> +#define TEGRA30_CLK_CSIA_PAD 309
> >> +#define TEGRA30_CLK_CSIB_PAD 310
> >> +#define TEGRA30_CLK_CLK_MAX 311
> >> 
> >>  #endif    /* _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_TEGRA30_CAR_H */
> >
> >The commit message refers to tegra20, but contents are tegra30.
> 
> My, bad, it should be tegra30
> 
> >Regarding the CLK_MAX define, I agree that it would be better to get rid of
> >it. Perhaps you can check if it would be reasonable to calculate it
> >dynamically in the driver, but a define and sanity check in the driver
> >would work too, I think.
> 
> It is not unreasonable, but moving this elsewhere may cause issues with
> adding new clocks. Addind new clocks would require updating not only header
> but also a place where max clocks are moved to and ai am not sure how can I
> dinamically calculate amount of clocks in the driver without updating both
> header and driver with each new clock added. Maybe you can propose a
> method?

Looking at the code, it's probably better to just move the CLK_MAX define into 
the source code. We can leave a comment here as reminder to update the define 
in the code if any new clocks are added. This happens so rarely that I don't 
think it should be a problem.

> >Cheers,
> >Mikko




Reply via email to