On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:53:15AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: > Is there any compelling reason to report single buffer visuals?
Dunno, you tell me ;o) Here's how I noticed, some of the Mesa demos use single buffer (or either as an option). The existing (commented out) page flipping code checks for a double buffered visual before enabling page flipping, the result is your sb mesa demo is using a db visual and doesn't call swap buffers so you don't see anything. Admittedly the page flipping doesn't exist yet, what I did to get it working is a kludge but something here has it wrong - either the mesa demo isn't checking the visual it gets from glut or glut doesn't tell you this kind of thing, or we need sb visuals for apps that ask for them. I've not really looked far enough to see which. It's obviously not an issue until page flipping is back, but I think an extra loop to add an SB visual for each visual we currently do would be all that's needed... -- Michael. _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
