On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:05:33AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: > Doesn't sound like it's necessary. However, I would avoid spelling out > "No Single Buffer Visual" in a feature checklist if that functionality > is indeed present. The first thing I thought of when I saw this was "is > front buffer rendering broken?".
Nod, but it is true even if your interpretation of what "no sb visuals" meant wasn't correct, even if, as you say, it doesn't matter because it's transparent. (most of the list is transparant to the client, since the app is using opengl, so it's transparent whether the buffer is Z, W, int, float etc etc or whether the card is using TCL or hw or sw) I don't think the point of the list is determining transparancy? Page flipping is broken, regardless of where the actual bug lies even if the "bug" is the complete lack of the feature and the resulting performance loss. Depends what your expectations are I guess. -- Michael. _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
