> The result of a missing reply-to header is that > you have to use the reply-all function of your > mail client to answer back to the list, which > seems unnatural. In most cases, answers seem > to be sent in private mail as implied by the > missing header. > > As of my perception, this makes the list *more* > noisy as required and renders the list archive > less useful. Let me explain.
I agree. Useful responses are not publicly archived, which means they are not searchable, which means we get the same questions over and over -- not because there is no answer, but because there is no *public* answer. I would very much appreciate the reconfiguration of dspace-tech to reply-to-list instead of reply-to-sender. Dorothea -- Dorothea Salo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Digital Repository Librarian AIM: mindsatuw University of Wisconsin Rm 218, Memorial Library (608) 262-5493 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
