On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:34:23AM -0400, Larry Stone wrote: > FWIW, some of the lists to which I subscribe "mung" the reply-to header > to force replies to go to the list, and some don't -- I'm invariably > annoyed by the ones that _do_ mung headers. So take this as a vote NOT to > change the behavior of the DSpace lists. > > My mail user agent is a certifiable antique, but it has simple, separate > commands for "reply to sender" and "reply to all". I prefer to have that > option, but it goes away if teh Reply-To header forces a reply to the > list even when I choose to write only to "sender". I suspect we'll see > a bunch of inadvertent posts to the whole lists if this gets changed, too. > > -- Larry
+1 from someone who always hits 'g'. Jim -- James Rutherford | Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Research Engineer | Cain Road, HP Labs | Bracknell, Bristol, UK | Berks +44 117 312 7066 | RG12 1HN. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Registered No: 690597 England The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error, you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender. To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated you should consider this message and attachments as "HP CONFIDENTIAL". ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
