Hello, Am 01.08.2007 um 14:05 schrieb James Rutherford:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:34:23AM -0400, Larry Stone wrote: Huh, forgot the "g"? SCNR. You all helped me that much with this thread to change my habit from r -> g. Honestly. Am 31.07.2007 um 22:30 schrieb Hilmar Lapp: > It also might be a field-specific preference. > I'm on many programming/open-source project mailing lists, > and almost universally, and purposefully, they are set to > not munge the reply-to header Probably thats the point. Whether dspace-tech community is programmer-centric and should "help" participants to learn new habits that are expected in this then-new area. I personally still feel, there could be a difference between dspace-general and dspace-tech as user-centric lists and dspace-devel, dspace-manakin and so on as programmer-centric. But after I learned that programmers feel annoyed by munged headers I fear to scare them off this list. This would be exactly the opposite of my original intent. In such a case, either the "never change a running system" rule applies or the "you say no until the day you finally agree". We will see... Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
