----- Original Message ----- > From: Marko Weber <we...@zackbummfertig.de> > To: Dspam User <dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of > spam/non-spam >
> > Mr Fatula, yes you are right with dovecot-antispam, just move mail and > all is okay. > BUT, i plan to use a mail server as FILTER GATEWAY, so the users have > the mails on their own server (xchange at example), > so they have to send the mail back to my mail-gateway and cant use > dovecot antispam. > nex thing is, > when u use a global ham@ and a global spam@, and want to use "per > user" retrain it wont work, am i right? No, it's simple to set one up as ham and spam and have it determine the user. The user is simply who sent the mail back to you to train as spam or ham, right? Failing that, it's in the message if forwarded as an attachment. I've found requiring them to forward as attachment not so simple for users though, esp. exchange users for some reason (I don't use exchange and never have, so, not sure why). In the end, they give up and don't bother. > so, there has to be a way to do spam-add-<username>@domainn.tld & > spam-del-<username>@domainn.tld ..... I suppose you could use extended addressing in some way, there's lots of examples out there on doing this. You'll have to get that signature though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
