On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Steve Fatula wrote: > I've found requiring them to forward as attachment not so simple for users > though, esp. exchange users for some reason (I don't use exchange and never > have, so, not sure why). In the end, they give up and don't bother.
While I despise Outlook I had to use it for a over year. :( With those clients in mind I have set the defaults for the DSPAM signature to go into the message body. Because finding the headers in Outlook is extremely difficult to say the least, possible but very ugly. Figure Outlook users can simply forward the message to the address and then the signature should be present in the body. Being a user preference they can easily change it if they desire. (Assuming I've given them an interface to do so.) Having the DSPAM signature only in the message headers could be problematic for Exchange/Outlook users as the headers are difficult to get at and yeah I'd probably give up too. :) Thus my idea of a Outlook plugin which maybe the best solution for those users. Just read the note from Stevan. Yeah the idea of supporting an Outlook plugin, scares the tripe out of me. So maybe I can get the users trained to simply forward the message to address@. -Chad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
