On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, but the whole point of interests is to find people who use their
> journal to talk about things you find interesting, too.  What does it
> matter to someone looking up journals they might want to watch for posts
> about, say, Italian Opera, that you like Italian Opera if you never
> actually post anything about it?

I don't think all of people's listed interests are necessarily
relevant to people performing interest searches. I don't personally
use interest searches to locate people to read based on the idea that
I think they will talk about this item. I do refer to someone's listed
interests, including things that they never write about, when
encountering them and trying to figure out if I think I will get along
well with them. Interests have been used to indicate support for an
ideological position (see the LiveJournal interest "tits against the
RTE", in support of the removal-as-default or complete removal of the
Rich Text Editor). It gets used to convey in-jokes, and to show
membership in a social clique of people who think this particular
in-joke is funny.

Any change that would threaten any of the extra uses of the interests
feature would have to be very carefully considered.

--Azz
_______________________________________________
dw-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss

Reply via email to