-1 Do not bloat IDEA. I do not need UML in idea. You usually modell something and when writing code, you only remodell from time to time. You can use an UML tool for modelling, export to XMI and use XSL to generate the classes. We use something similiar, we generate not only the UML defined classes but usually a lot of support classes (forms, session beans, XML converter). For deployment descriptors and interfaces we use xDoclet, which is fine. We only need IDEA to understand the relationships between remote/home/local/business classes and interfaces,
my 2c bye -stephan On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 09:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > These are my wishes, I know there's been talk of UML capabilities earlier > and I really look forward to seeing it :) > A strong integration with J2EE would also be very nice thing to have (for > me it's a must have, but maybe not for others). Here I'm especially > thinking about deployment for multiple server (CMP 2.0 deployment also) and > easy debugging/testing. I the last point is a huge one, but it would still > be very nice. > Together has nice UML and J2EE integration, but their editor is really bad > compared to the raw power of IDEA. > > Just my 2 cents. > > /Jeppe > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
