Wahey YES! Reverse-engineered UML class diagrams from unknown source code. This just gets better and better!
So when can we expect #2 then, Eugene? :o) Cheers, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Eugene Belyaev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 November 2001 15:14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Eap-features] J2EE integration and UML capabilities > > > There are two main use cases of using a UML tool: > > 1) When designing some large subsystems it's very convenient to work > with a modeling tool. Here a lot of different types of UML > diagrams can > be useful. It's also useful that tools like Together automatically > round-trip code for you. The drawback is that it needs to store a lot > of meta-information in the code, thus leaving a lot of comments. > 2) For navigation and quick overviews of the code. The only really > useful tool here is an ability to look at a class diagram > quickly built > from the source code. > > I would not want IDEA to go for the #1, but #2 is definitely desired a > lot. > > Best regards, > > Eugene Belyaev > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com > "Develop with pleasure" > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephan > > J. Schmidt > > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 5:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Eap-features] J2EE integration and UML capabilities > > > > > > -1 > > > > Do not bloat IDEA. I do not need UML in idea. You usually > > modell something and when writing code, you only remodell > > from time to time. You can use an UML tool for modelling, > > export to XMI and use XSL to generate the classes. We use > > something similiar, we generate not only the UML defined > > classes but usually a lot of support classes (forms, session > > beans, XML converter). For deployment descriptors and > > interfaces we use xDoclet, which is fine. We only need IDEA > > to understand the relationships between > > remote/home/local/business classes and interfaces, > > > > my 2c > > bye > > -stephan > > > > On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 09:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > These are my wishes, I know there's been talk of UML capabilities > > > earlier and I really look forward to seeing it :) A strong > > integration > > > with J2EE would also be very nice thing to have (for me > it's a must > > > have, but maybe not for others). Here I'm especially > thinking about > > > deployment for multiple server (CMP 2.0 deployment also) and easy > > > debugging/testing. I the last point is a huge one, but it > > would still > > > be very nice. Together has nice UML and J2EE integration, > but their > > > editor is really bad compared to the raw power of IDEA. > > > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > > > > /Jeppe > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-features mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-features mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-> features > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > *************************************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. *************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
