Hi, It seems to me that the ideal solution is to have the capability of an emacs style key binding, but supply two default keymaps. The first (classic) version would be very much as it is now and as you say less often used commands will simply not have a mapping, while the second would be in the emacs style and keep as many emacs conventions as possible.
That way we can all have the system that works best for us and neither group needs to start from scratch and do a lot of reconfig work before using idea. Regards Huw Randy Defauw wrote: > This is one vote against having double keystrokes. I mainly work on > Windows, and only a little on Unix/Linux, so I'm not used to the > Emacs-style key bindings. I've found with many IDEs that there are > too many actions and not enough key strokes; and I only remember the > key strokes that I use the most anyway. So, I guess I'd rather keep > short and simple key strokes for the commands I use, and just not have > any for the rest, instead of using double strokes for a lot of things. > > Of course, if I can configure the key bindings to eliminate the double > strokes, then I guess the default settings don't matter that much. > > Regards, > Randy DeFauw > Software Engineer > Xifin > 760 804 0770 x41 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 2233 Faraday Suite A > Carlsbad, CA 92008 > > This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not > the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all > copies of the original message. > > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
