Ok, just to clarify a few issues: there _will_ be a few default keymaps.
Not just one as now, so this is not the question.  

Best regards,

Eugene Belyaev
IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure" 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bluntpeak
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Keyboard usage
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems to me that the ideal solution is to have the 
> capability of an 
> emacs style key binding, but supply two default keymaps. The first 
> (classic) version would be very much as it is now and as you say less 
> often used commands will simply not have a mapping, while the second 
> would be in the emacs style and keep as many emacs 
> conventions as possible.
> 
> That way we can all have the system that works best for us 
> and neither 
> group needs to start from scratch and do a lot of reconfig 
> work before 
> using idea.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Huw
> 
> 
> 
> Randy Defauw wrote:
> 
> > This is one vote against having double keystrokes.  I mainly work on
> > Windows, and only a little on Unix/Linux, so I'm not used to the 
> > Emacs-style key bindings.  I've found with many IDEs that there are 
> > too many actions and not enough key strokes; and I only 
> remember the 
> > key strokes that I use the most anyway.  So, I guess I'd 
> rather keep 
> > short and simple key strokes for the commands I use, and 
> just not have 
> > any for the rest, instead of using double strokes for a lot 
> of things.
> >
> > Of course, if I can configure the key bindings to eliminate 
> the double
> > strokes, then I guess the default settings don't matter that much.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Randy DeFauw
> > Software Engineer
> > Xifin
> > 760 804 0770 x41
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <<...OLE_Obj...>> 
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
> > 2233 Faraday Suite A   
> > Carlsbad, CA 92008
> >
> > This message is for the sole use of the intended 
> recipient(s) and may
> > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
> > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are not 
> > the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all 
> > copies of the original message.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> 


_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to