On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:27:46 +0400, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote: Nope, works like a charm here.
>We measured 509 perfgormance here and found that 509 is much faster than >508. The most realistic results could be obtained when measuring speed of >project reopening several times. > >Anybody else experiencing performance problems with 509? > >Best regards, >Eugene Zhuravlev >IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ >"Develop with pleasure" > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Carlos Costa e Silva >> Sent: 24 October, 2001 9:03 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >> >> >> >> Well, for me it's only a little faster :( >> The time between launching idea and the "Loading project." panel is >> shown is on a par with 506. >> >From then on, loading the project still takes 60 seconds+ >> >> Total cpu time loading idea 507: 20 seconds. >> Total cpu time loading idea 508: 1 minute 20 seconds. >> Total cpu time loading idea 509: 1 minute 10 seconds: 10 seconds >> loading idea, 60 seconds loading the project. >> >> Switching to a small project: no problem. >> Switching back to my project: 60 seconds. >> >> Can it be because of having jdk1.4 as the client jdk in the >> project? Idea itself runs under jdk1.3.1. >> >> Carlos >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: quarta-feira, 24 de Outubro de 2001 16:08 >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >> > >> > >> > Yes, it was the reason of the performance degradation, but we have >> > simply switched off the string obfuscation. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Eugene Belyaev, >> > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com >> > "Develop with pleasure" >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > On Behalf Of kesha >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:21 PM >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >> > >> > >> > We also evaluated this product and switched to something else. One >> > feature of this obfuscator is the encoding of static strings which >> > increases the size of your jar and as consequence the >> working set of >> > your application. Besides every time you are trying to >> access a static >> > string, this string gets decoded. That might be a reason for the >> > performance degradation. >> > >> > >> > /kesh >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Eugene Belyaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:03 AM >> > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >> > >> > >> > > We have been trying Zelix KlassMaster for the latest build. >> > > >> > > Main features we require from an obfuscator are: >> > > >> > > - An ability to easily unscramble stack traces given the log file >> > > - Scrambled line numbers >> > > - Incremental obfuscation >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > >> > > Eugene Belyaev, >> > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com >> > > "Develop with pleasure" >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > On Behalf Of Bluntpeak >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:36 PM >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >> > >> > >> > Slightly off topic I know, >> > >> > Could we inquire what obfuscator you are using and why you >> changed. I >> > ask because we will be looking at this side of things in the near >> > future >> > >> > and any opinions on specific products would be most welcome. >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > H >> > >> > >> > >> > Eugene Belyaev wrote: >> > >> > > Well, a possible reason for the slowdown is that we have >> switched to >> >> > > another obfuscator in 508. We will investigate and fix >> these issues >> >> > > very soon. >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > >> > > Eugene Belyaev, >> > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com >> > > "Develop with pleasure" >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Eap-list mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Eap-list mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Eap-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Eap-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Eap-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> > >_______________________________________________ >Eap-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
