Found the problem with the slow startup.
After much tinkering - removing sourcepaths/classpaths/... I recreated the project. Success. Startup is normal now - if not faster than before :) Ah, forgot to add cvs to the project. Adding cvs-> problem reappears idea takes a long time starting. I see that due to heavy refactoring in the last few days, I have about 60 files changed/yet to be added to cvs. Navigating the cvs panel - with hide-up-to-date files on is very slowwww. On every directory I enter, idea stops for a few seconds using 100% cpu. After commiting the files with wincvs the problem disappears. With no files changed, startup and navigation on the cvs panel work all right. With 507 I had no problem starting up and I think (though I'm not sure) that navigating the cvs panel also didn't have any delays. Any changes to cvs on 508/9? For now, the problem is gone. Carlos > -----Original Message----- > From: carlos /Keysoft > Sent: quarta-feira, 24 de Outubro de 2001 18:03 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup > > > > Well, for me it's only a little faster :( > The time between launching idea and the "Loading project." panel is > shown is on a par with 506. > From then on, loading the project still takes 60 seconds+ > > Total cpu time loading idea 507: 20 seconds. > Total cpu time loading idea 508: 1 minute 20 seconds. > Total cpu time loading idea 509: 1 minute 10 seconds: 10 seconds > loading idea, 60 seconds loading the project. > > Switching to a small project: no problem. > Switching back to my project: 60 seconds. > > Can it be because of having jdk1.4 as the client jdk in the project? > Idea itself runs under jdk1.3.1. > > Carlos > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: quarta-feira, 24 de Outubro de 2001 16:08 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup > > > > > > Yes, it was the reason of the performance degradation, but we have > > simply switched off the string obfuscation. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Eugene Belyaev, > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com > > "Develop with pleasure" > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Behalf Of kesha > > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:21 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup > > > > > > We also evaluated this product and switched to something else. One > > feature of this obfuscator is the encoding of static strings which > > increases the size of your jar and as consequence the working set of > > your application. Besides every time you are trying to > access a static > > string, this string gets decoded. That might be a reason for the > > performance degradation. > > > > > > /kesh > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Eugene Belyaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:03 AM > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup > > > > > > > We have been trying Zelix KlassMaster for the latest build. > > > > > > Main features we require from an obfuscator are: > > > > > > - An ability to easily unscramble stack traces given the log file > > > - Scrambled line numbers > > > - Incremental obfuscation > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Eugene Belyaev, > > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com > > > "Develop with pleasure" > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Behalf Of Bluntpeak > > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup > > > > > > Slightly off topic I know, > > > > Could we inquire what obfuscator you are using and why you > changed. I > > ask because we will be looking at this side of things in the near > > future > > > > and any opinions on specific products would be most welcome. > > > > Regards > > > > H > > > > > > > > Eugene Belyaev wrote: > > > > > Well, a possible reason for the slowdown is that we have > switched to > > > > another obfuscator in 508. We will investigate and fix > these issues > > > > very soon. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Eugene Belyaev, > > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com > > > "Develop with pleasure" > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
