Have only been using it for the last 3-4 hours but it seems fine here as well.
H Yura Cangea wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:27:46 +0400, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote: > > Nope, works like a charm here. > > >>We measured 509 perfgormance here and found that 509 is much faster than >>508. The most realistic results could be obtained when measuring speed of >>project reopening several times. >> >>Anybody else experiencing performance problems with 509? >> >>Best regards, >>Eugene Zhuravlev >>IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ >>"Develop with pleasure" >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Carlos Costa e Silva >>>Sent: 24 October, 2001 9:03 PM >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >>> >>> >>> >>>Well, for me it's only a little faster :( >>>The time between launching idea and the "Loading project." panel is >>>shown is on a par with 506. >>>>From then on, loading the project still takes 60 seconds+ >>> >>>Total cpu time loading idea 507: 20 seconds. >>>Total cpu time loading idea 508: 1 minute 20 seconds. >>>Total cpu time loading idea 509: 1 minute 10 seconds: 10 seconds >>>loading idea, 60 seconds loading the project. >>> >>>Switching to a small project: no problem. >>>Switching back to my project: 60 seconds. >>> >>>Can it be because of having jdk1.4 as the client jdk in the >>>project? Idea itself runs under jdk1.3.1. >>> >>>Carlos >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>>Sent: quarta-feira, 24 de Outubro de 2001 16:08 >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >>>> >>>> >>>>Yes, it was the reason of the performance degradation, but we have >>>>simply switched off the string obfuscation. >>>> >>>>Best regards, >>>> >>>>Eugene Belyaev, >>>>IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com >>>>"Develop with pleasure" >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> >>>>On Behalf Of kesha >>>>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:21 PM >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: Re: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >>>> >>>> >>>>We also evaluated this product and switched to something else. One >>>>feature of this obfuscator is the encoding of static strings which >>>>increases the size of your jar and as consequence the >>>> >>>working set of >>> >>>>your application. Besides every time you are trying to >>>> >>>access a static >>> >>>>string, this string gets decoded. That might be a reason for the >>>>performance degradation. >>>> >>>> >>>>/kesh >>>> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>From: "Eugene Belyaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:03 AM >>>>Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>We have been trying Zelix KlassMaster for the latest build. >>>>> >>>>>Main features we require from an obfuscator are: >>>>> >>>>>- An ability to easily unscramble stack traces given the log file >>>>>- Scrambled line numbers >>>>>- Incremental obfuscation >>>>> >>>>>Best regards, >>>>> >>>>>Eugene Belyaev, >>>>>IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com >>>>>"Develop with pleasure" >>>>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> >>>>On Behalf Of Bluntpeak >>>>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:36 PM >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: Re: [Eap-list] #508 Exception and startup >>>> >>>> >>>>Slightly off topic I know, >>>> >>>>Could we inquire what obfuscator you are using and why you >>>> >>>changed. I >>> >>>>ask because we will be looking at this side of things in the near >>>>future >>>> >>>>and any opinions on specific products would be most welcome. >>>> >>>>Regards >>>> >>>>H >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Eugene Belyaev wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Well, a possible reason for the slowdown is that we have >>>>> >>>switched to >>> >>> >>>>>another obfuscator in 508. We will investigate and fix >>>>> >>>these issues >>> >>> >>>>>very soon. >>>>> >>>>>Best regards, >>>>> >>>>>Eugene Belyaev, >>>>>IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com >>>>>"Develop with pleasure" >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Eap-list mailing list >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Eap-list mailing list >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >>>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Eap-list mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Eap-list mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Eap-list mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Eap-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
