On Mon, 22 May 1995, Mary C. Simmons, Hydrologic Assistant, Albuquerque, NM  wrote:

>   Politicians and athletes and talk show hosts 
> contribute virtually nothing, yet are paid the most.  Teachers and day-care 
> providers and health care providers contribute much more, yet with the 
> exception of the doctors, are on the lower end.  Where is there justice in 
> this?  

I agree with almost all of the above, BUT....

I would like to register an objection to the notion that politicians 
contribute virtually nothing.  I know that this anti-politician rhetoric 
is widely accepted and I know that there are politicians who are 
interested primarily in themselves, in supporting special interests, and 
in getting re-elected.  But, as someone who lives just outside of 
Washington DC and who knows some of these "politicians" my own experience 
is that most of them are extremely hard-working, very conscientious, and 
honestly trying to do the best they can for the people of their 
districsts WITHIN THE SYSTEM.  Now, the SYSTEM may be totally screwed up 
and some might even say beyond redemption or repair....  But, that does 
not mean that the PEOPLE are evil or that they contribute nothing.  It 
was politicians such as Hubert Humphrey who pushed through legislation to 
protect the environment.... Without politicians would we have even the 
modest enviro protection laws that we do have? 

Nor are 
politicians (at least in the United 
States) drawing astoundingly large salaries.  Yes, they are bigger than 
average.  But, there are also major expenses involved in maintaining a 
home in Washington and a home in your district.  Ask anyone who has 
moved to this area about the heart attack they had when they went to 
look for a house.  Even a 
modest, 45 year old 3 bedroom home runs close to $200,000 in this area.

For the amount of work these people do, they are probably underpaid by 
most standards.  Any one of them could earn a great deal more in private 
enterprise -- if you want to talk about over paid people, why not look at 
the CEOs of the major corporations?  They take absolutely no interest in 
benefitting anyone other than themselves, their companies, and their 
shareholders and they are paid mega-bucks.  In the past 15-20 years they 
have gutted entire towns and communities, laid off workers, etc. and have 
been rewarded for these efforts with salaries so far greater than their 
own workers that it is hard to comprehend.  If they do screw up and get 
fired, it is with a generous golden parachute paid for by wage freezes 
and cut backs among the average workers.

This kind of talk about politicians as a group is similar to the slamming 
of "bureaucrats" by Newt and friends.  It is inaccurate and possibly even 
dangerous.

Jayne
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 22 15:13:19 1995
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: power communication 
Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 15:15:53 -0600
From: "Mary C. Simmons, Hydrologic Assistant, Albuquerque, NM 
"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Well, Jayne, I think you are right, there ARE some politicians who work hard, 
and I'm sure Newt Gingrich is one of them, though I personally don't care for 
the work that he does.  I brought politicians into the argument, as being 
among the group who contributes least and receives the most monetary 
compensation, because I really believe they are an over-privileged elite, 
composed mostly of white males.  Let us not forget that almost none of these 
guys live on their paltry 6-figure incomes--most of them, as a result of their 
political connections, receive loads-o-dough from speeches, books, etc, 
because of WHO THEY ARE.  A lot of them are up in the million dollar income 
range--leading lives of extreme privilege.

It is still WAY out of balance.  Lots of people work that hard, yet do not 
receive anywhere close to the same kinds of compensations, or privileges.

This is not to say "everyone should make $9/hour".  I think this is very 
narrow thinking, and yet another example of the "either-or" mode we seem to 
have such trouble shaking.  

I still want to drag this idea back to the concept of "value as human beings", 
not "value as future commodity", or value as "who does the most work", or "who 
has the most education", or "who is doing the most VALUABLE work".  Etc.

Mary.


_________________________________________________________________________
Mary Simmons
U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division  
Albuquerque, New Mexico 
(505)262-5332
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Reply via email to