Michael,

Yes, there is a problem with this - at least for MY situation.

We use the SOPI structure for a reason....  The format works better 
for US....

HL 1 - Shipment
info about the particular shipment (carrier, BOL, ship date, etc.)
HL 2 - Order
This is where the specific PO information is sent - PO #, dates, etc.
HL 3 - Pack
Info about the package - i.e. the UCC128 lable number.
HL 4 - Item
This is the item specific information - SKU, UPC, Vendor Style, etc.
Also UOM (ea vs. dz) and quantity in the carton/package.

>From here on, the P and I levels repeat for each carton in the 
shipment.

If the vendor is mixing multiple POs in a single shipment (which we 
allow), then the format would be:

S
O
P
I
P
I
P
I
P
I
O
P
I
P
I
O
P
I

etc...  Each new PO would have a new HL for ORDER and then the Pack 
and Item levels for that PO.

And semantics are not an - again for MY situation.  We are the 
BUYER - and we, therefore, are the RECEIVER of the ASN.  The SELLER 
is the SENDER of the ASN.  So My use of SENDER and RECEIVER would 
equate to SELLER and BUYER, respectively, for the post.  As we sell 
through retail outlets and have no online business, we don't send 
any kind of ASN out.

Craig Dunham
EDI Coordinator
Big 5 Sporting Goods

--- In [email protected], "Michael Mattias/LS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> > As for Michael's post about "Although personally I would never 
use "O"
> > level above either P or I, I'd use a PRF segment at the Item 
level
> > whereever that ends up." - there's a problem with this....
> 
> There is?
> 
> Pick and Pack...
> HL*1**S
>    stuff
>    HL*2**P
>       pack info
>       HL*3 **I
>         PRF
>         ItemInfo
>      HL*4
>         PRF
>         more item info
>   HL*5**P   next pack
> 
> Standard Pack
> HL*1**S
>    stuff
>    HL*2**I
>       PRF
>       HL*3 **P
>       Pack info
>       HL*4**P    next pack of this item for this PO
>    HL*I
>      PRF
>      HL*n**P    first pack of this item for another PO..
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Perhaps just a semantic thing, but.....you make numerous 
references in your 
> post to both 'sender' and 'receiver'  of the ASN.
> 
> In my experience the data requirements are based not so much who 
is sending 
> and who is receiving the ASN, but on who is BUYING and who is 
SELLING the 
> merchandise.
> 
> Michael C. Mattias
> Tal Systems Inc.
> Racine WI
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>




...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to