The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will only log so much
information before things start falling off into the ether.
Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know of an easy way
of archiving conversations publicly?
On 11/16/2018 9:56 AM, Zimmer, Vincent wrote:
https://slack.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin D
Davis
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM
To: stephano <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software
If we get to vote, I’d vote against Google Groups. Their interface is
very geared toward their internal work flow and seems to change on a whim.
Thanks,Kevin
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM -0600, "stephano"
<[email protected]> wrote:
We are looking to augment our current communication methods (mailing list /
IRC) with a modern solution for group collaboration. The goal is to allow folks
to communicate effectively without interrupting the current patch review
system, as well as enabling any future systems with more robust options.
Specific features we are looking for include attachments (currently blocked by
the list), robust logging, modern chat, and integration with tools like bug
trackers and source repositories (APIs, or better yet, pre-rolled plugins).
Our current contenders are Google Groups and Groups.io. This RFC is in hopes of
finding other options to evaluate.
Cheers,
Stephano
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
