All of these reasons (along with scalability) is why the linux kernel development hasn't moved from email mailing lists and they have tried several times.
Cheers, Tom On 16/11/2018 22:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 16/11/18 21:46, stephano wrote: >> This looks great. >> >> I'm going to dig in a bit and see if we can export discussions for logging >> purposes or if they are locked into Github. > > For people on the move, having bad internet (3rd world countries), email > system is very powerful, you can download once and work offline, > reading/answering. You can also download the list archive and refers to it > offline. You also have access to all patches and can apply them offline too. > > Is this possible with GitHub? > > Maybe the open source alternative, GitLab, offers a such feature. > > Googling "gitlab offline" I get: > > "Many of our customers do not have regular Internet access and many of them, > being highly regulated, cannot install local copies of GitLab to be able to > run against the provided API. [...] The work, published as the > gitlab-ci-yaml_lint gem, is my attempt at a start to solving the issue." > > This is not what I expected, but it confirms some people have troubles > working with online-only services. > > Regards, > > Phil. > >> >> git clone git://tianocore.discussion ? :) >> >> On 11/16/2018 11:55 AM, Kinney, Michael D wrote: >>> Hi Stephano, >>> >>> GitHub supports discussions for teams. >>> >>> If we added a new team to the GitHub TianoCore >>> organization for all developers that want to be >>> involved in community topics and design discussions >>> (which should closely match the current members of >>> edk2-devel) then that may be a simple option that >>> uses services that already there. >>> >>> Another option is to use discussions for one of the >>> exiting teams (e.g. Tianocore Maintainers) and make >>> posts for these discussion topics public. >>> >>> https://blog.github.com/2017-11-20-introducing-team-discussions/ >>> >>> https://help.github.com/articles/about-team-discussions/ >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> On Behalf Of stephano >>>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:14 AM >>>> To: Zimmer, Vincent <[email protected]>; edk2- >>>> [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration >>>> Software >>>> >>>> The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will >>>> only log so much >>>> information before things start falling off into the >>>> ether. >>>> >>>> Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know >>>> of an easy way >>>> of archiving conversations publicly? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/16/2018 9:56 AM, Zimmer, Vincent wrote: >>>>> https://slack.com/ >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel- >>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin D Davis >>>>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM >>>>> To: stephano <[email protected]>; edk2- >>>> [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration >>>> Software >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If we get to vote, I’d vote against Google >>>> Groups. Their interface is very geared toward their >>>> internal work flow and seems to change on a whim. >>>> Thanks,Kevin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM -0600, "stephano" >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We are looking to augment our current communication >>>> methods (mailing list / IRC) with a modern solution for >>>> group collaboration. The goal is to allow folks to >>>> communicate effectively without interrupting the current >>>> patch review system, as well as enabling any future >>>> systems with more robust options. >>>>> >>>>> Specific features we are looking for include >>>> attachments (currently blocked by the list), robust >>>> logging, modern chat, and integration with tools like bug >>>> trackers and source repositories (APIs, or better yet, >>>> pre-rolled plugins). >>>>> >>>>> Our current contenders are Google Groups and Groups.io. >>>> This RFC is in hopes of finding other options to >>>> evaluate. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Stephano >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> edk2-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> edk2-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> edk2-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> edk2-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
