Mike, I like the github teams option for discussion as it is just there, free, and easy. It integrates nicely with all other parts of github. Notifications are supported for those that want email. Is there any reason this path doesn't get used now as a test since tianocore is already in github?
I really can't get behind the Phabricator tool suite as it just has too many downsides (self-hosted or pay, lack of integrations, lack of support and limited searchability, poor ci integration, etc). Thanks Sean -----Original Message----- From: edk2-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kinney, Michael D Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:55 AM To: stephano <[email protected]>; Zimmer, Vincent <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software Hi Stephano, GitHub supports discussions for teams. If we added a new team to the GitHub TianoCore organization for all developers that want to be involved in community topics and design discussions (which should closely match the current members of edk2-devel) then that may be a simple option that uses services that already there. Another option is to use discussions for one of the exiting teams (e.g. Tianocore Maintainers) and make posts for these discussion topics public. https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.github.com%2F2017-11-20-introducing-team-discussions%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csean.brogan%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636779949096981093&sdata=m%2BL8FRVa3yxdwLYUaCF1qC%2FfZ9IUp5kigjiUMJxSzJo%3D&reserved=0 https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Farticles%2Fabout-team-discussions%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csean.brogan%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636779949096991106&sdata=5QLuiHfs%2FmgR3UHC4BeYasDWAkf5zBR5s71ttRmeNAg%3D&reserved=0 Best regards, Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of stephano > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 11:14 AM > To: Zimmer, Vincent <[email protected]>; edk2- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software > > The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will only log so > much information before things start falling off into the ether. > > Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know of an easy > way of archiving conversations publicly? > > > On 11/16/2018 9:56 AM, Zimmer, Vincent wrote: > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsla > > ck.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csean.brogan%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e > > 6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7 > > C636779949096991106&sdata=flNeQfd9Tq2yX7ZUouV8pkINvofIRjeSoaTB6Y > > ojWPg%3D&reserved=0 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin D Davis > > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM > > To: stephano <[email protected]>; edk2- > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration > Software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we get to vote, I’d vote against Google > Groups. Their interface is very geared toward their internal work > flow and seems to change on a whim. > Thanks,Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM -0600, "stephano" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are looking to augment our current communication > methods (mailing list / IRC) with a modern solution for group > collaboration. The goal is to allow folks to communicate effectively > without interrupting the current patch review system, as well as > enabling any future systems with more robust options. > > > > Specific features we are looking for include > attachments (currently blocked by the list), robust logging, modern > chat, and integration with tools like bug trackers and source > repositories (APIs, or better yet, pre-rolled plugins). > > > > Our current contenders are Google Groups and Groups.io. > This RFC is in hopes of finding other options to evaluate. > > > > Cheers, > > Stephano > > _______________________________________________ > > edk2-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flis > > ts.01.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fedk2-devel&data=02%7C01%7Csean. > > brogan%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf > > 86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636779949096991106&sdata=B147 > > wIbtDPoPYvHzds53CFlU6BBa9UKjoAuCJ8LMWFc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > edk2-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flis > > ts.01.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fedk2-devel&data=02%7C01%7Csean. > > brogan%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf > > 86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636779949096991106&sdata=B147 > > wIbtDPoPYvHzds53CFlU6BBa9UKjoAuCJ8LMWFc%3D&reserved=0 > > > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists > .01.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fedk2-devel&data=02%7C01%7Csean.brog > an%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf86f141 > af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636779949096991106&sdata=B147wIbtDPoP > YvHzds53CFlU6BBa9UKjoAuCJ8LMWFc%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.01.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fedk2-devel&data=02%7C01%7Csean.brogan%40microsoft.com%7C90c7b5b8e6544710547308d64bfd68ac%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636779949096991106&sdata=B147wIbtDPoPYvHzds53CFlU6BBa9UKjoAuCJ8LMWFc%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
