In a message dated 9/1/05 4:30:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There are a great many of us who would at least like to see a CW > requirement maintained for the Extra Class exam. There is a very > small (but real) chance that the FCC would do that if they are > provided with novel and compelling reasons. (Note: The traditional > arguments, such as "Without the code test, ham radio will become > another Citizen's Band," are known to the FCC, and they are > unconvinced by them. We need to get the FCC to say, "Gee, we never > thought of that.") If you'd like to see some semblance of a code test > preserved, this is the time to think outside the box. > Some ideas: 1) Don't compromise on what you really want. FCC has a history of going a step farther, so a comment for Extra only code tests looks to them like a comment for none at all. If you think Element 1 should stay, say so! 2) Point out the wide use of Morse Code on HF by hams, and particularly its use by hams who are technically inclined, homebrewers, etc. 3) Despite the popularity of the mode, hams using Morse Code are rarely the subject of FCC enforcement actions. 4) Take the time to read the NPRM a couple of times, and specifically comment on FCC statements that you disagree with. For example, FCC called the FISTS recommendations of written-test changes "vague", yet they specifically spelled out exact steps to be taken to improve the written tests. 5) The reductions and eliminations in Morse Code testing since 1990 have not resulted in longterm changes in the growth of US amateur radio. Nor have they resulted in an increase in technical development, etc. 6) Suggest that FCC could do something similar to Canada (they still have code testing, but the grade is considered part of the overall testing, not a go/nogo standalone element). 7) Suggest that if the code test is eliminated, the bottom 15% of each HF band should be set aside for Morse Code only. 8) Write your comments in the standards form used by many commenters. (search ECFS for my comments to previous proposals - last name "Miccolis") 9) Include a brief description of your amateur and professional experience, education, etc. Whil it may feel like bragging, the FCC does look at who is commenting as well as what they say. 10) Take your time, spellcheck, proofread, etc. It really matters. Just IMHO 73 de Jim, N2EY _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
