> Are there any novel and compelling reasons for keeping the > code test?
Since we seem to be opening this topic again, let me repeat something I said before: The written tests (at least the Extra Class exam) already require knowledge of the fine details of certain modes, such as the level of black and white in SSTV transmissions. Requiring applicants to know 5 WPM Morse code is not unlike requiring knowledge of the details of these other modes. In lieu of a 5 WPM code test, I would not be opposed to putting code questions on the written test. All 40-50 letters, numbers, punctuations, and prosigns could be put in the question pool. One or two questions could be drawn at random in any particular test. I'm in favor of 5 WPM for Extra (actually, I'm in favor of 20 WPM for Extra, but I'm a fair, flexible, open-minded kind of a guy) but would accept a couple alternatives: 1) put the code in the written test as described above, or 2) remove all questions about the specifics of any given mode from the written test. You can search the list archives or browse the test questions for specific examples of questions that are candidates for removal. Craig NZ0R K1 #1966 K2/100 #4941 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
