There are additional aspects of these comparisons that are not often discussed.
The ergonomics of the two radios are vastly different... and rightly so given their history. The Icom has had many more generations of radios to improve the look, feel and operation of the radio. After owning and operating both, I find that both have adequate controls places appropriately... both radios could improve the menus (cryptic at times). The other aspect, which is sort of an elephant in the room is the repair histories and the way repairs are handled by the respective companies. I've never had a repair issue with my PRO III, although I have sent my 7800's back for service twice. It this case the radios sat in a queue at ICOM repair depot waiting for their turn to get fixed. Several weeks later the radios arrived without any warning, to sit out on my doorstep awaiting my arrival home. In contrast, I've had three issues with my K3... all three were diagnosed over the phone with tech support and parts shipped to me for install and immediate correction of the issues. While the K3 record on failures seems a bit higher than the Icom, the relative ease of troubleshooting and repair for a person like me (will full lab/ repair capabilities) is a wonder. Neither of these things should be missed when contemplating a new radio. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ / J68HZ/ 8P6HK/ ZF2HZ/ PJ4HZ/ VP5HZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch Staunton, Illinois email: [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [email protected]
