With due respect for those who disagree, it's not about us. I consider that
the need for a well-crafted Parity Act is NOT ours but a need of our sons
and daughters and THEIR sons and daughters, few of whom are parties to the
contracts to which onerous and often unconstitutionally vague and broad
CC&Rs are attached. If more than 80% of the US population is barred from
using truly effective HF antennas, the future of amateur radio is in doubt.
As a consequence, inadequacies in our national communications
infrastructure could, in the context of a disaster, multiply serious harm
to lives and property. As is often the case in the political realm, we'd do
well to think a great deal less about ourselves and a great deal more about
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mark Bayern <m...@mlb.net> wrote:
> I guess I get to be the guy posting to a closed thread. ouch!
> >>"FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a
> restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US
> All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the
> restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm
> willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to
> follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is
> VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate
> reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an
> area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is
> Mark AD5SS
> any responses by email please!
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> > On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote:
> >> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect
> >> list owner's wishes.
> > Note that I posted 6 hours before it was closed. And I posted again
> > getting to the email that closed it.
> > FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted
> > housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams.
> > lucky enough not to be restricted in this manner, but I know a lot of
> > who are.
> > 73, Jim K9YC
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > Message delivered to plcm...@gmail.com
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wbmcca...@gmail.com
This message was NOT sent using my iPhone or anyone else's iPhone.
Elecraft mailing list
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com