On 2021-06-29 6:28 PM, Dennis Moore wrote:
>
> Is the objection to the use of the internet to connect to that remote
> station?
No, the (my) objection is using multiple stations in a short period
of time. I would not have a problem with a "one station (location)"
per year, six months, or quarter ... but using multiple locations
on opposite coasts, per day/week is simply beyond what any amateur
could physically accomplish with *legitimate* relocations (even an
extensive RV operation).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2021-06-29 6:28 PM, Dennis Moore wrote:
I mostly agree with this. However, how would that compare to me packing
up my own station, driving from California to Delaware, setting up on
the beach so I could work a bunch of EU stations, then packing up and
going home, claiming those DX on my DXCC?
We all know that we can make a permanent move from one state to another
and we don't have to start DXCC all over again. There's obviously no
minimum length of time I have to remain at that new QTH, so it could be
an hour or 40 years.
Is the objection to the use of the internet to connect to that remote
station?
Dennis NJ6G
On 6/29/2021 15:00, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
However,
"shopping" rental stations for the best propagation to work some DX
station is simply immoral. ARRL should modify DXCC (and contest) rules
to limit the use of "remotely controlled stations" to *one station*,
with all transmitters, receivers and antennas within a 500 foot circle
of which the licensee is the sole owner of the station.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
